Re: Yet another (minor) fix in BRIN

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Yet another (minor) fix in BRIN
Date: 2020-11-08 03:45:26
Message-ID: 1776964.1604807126@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> On 2020-Nov-08, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> While rebasing some of the BRIN patches, I noticed some of the code in
>> brin_memtuple_initialize is duplicated. This happened in 8bf74967dab
>> which moved some of the code from brin_new_memtuple, not removing the
>> shared pieces. In practice this is benign, of course.
>>
>> Barring objections I'll get the attached fix committed and backpatched.

> LGTM, thanks for noticing.

The weekend before stable-branch releases is probably not the best
time to be pushing "minor" fixes into those branches. I got my
fingers burned today, and so did Peter. Don't follow our example ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2020-11-08 05:11:41 Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-11-08 01:51:37 Re: Yet another (minor) fix in BRIN