Re: PG 10 release notes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "'Bruce Momjian'" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 10 release notes
Date: 2017-09-19 16:30:01
Message-ID: 17762.1505838601@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"'Bruce Momjian'" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:22:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> We don't normally release-note documentation changes. If this
>> wasn't purely a documentation change, then I was probably in error
>> to decide it didn't need to be in the notes.

> It was purely a documentation change, but it was a documented change in a
> long-standing and popular practice of not using too many shared buffers
> on Windows, so I thought it wise to add it.

Well, if the intent of the note was to encourage people to raise
shared_buffers, it didn't do a very good job of that as written,
because I sure didn't understand it that way.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 'Bruce Momjian' 2017-09-19 16:32:04 Re: PG 10 release notes
Previous Message 'Bruce Momjian' 2017-09-19 16:27:47 Re: PG 10 release notes