Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] COPY view
Date: 2006-08-23 12:24:55
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> writes:
> What are these open issues for the updatable views patch you are seeing 
> exactly?

Didn't Alvaro list a bunch of issues when he put the patch back up for
comment?  I have not looked at it myself yet.

> i see the INSERT...RETURNING stuff as the only "big hurd" at the moment

That's not the fault of the updatable-views patch, but it definitely is
something we need to put some time into :-(

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg StarkDate: 2006-08-23 12:29:53
Subject: Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2006-08-23 12:11:24
Subject: Re: Question about (lazy) vacuum

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2006-08-23 12:42:47
Subject: plpgsql, return can contains any expression
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2006-08-23 12:08:24
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] COPY view

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group