Re: Refactoring pg_dump's getTables()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Refactoring pg_dump's getTables()
Date: 2021-10-19 13:23:35
Message-ID: 1773610.1634649815@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> On 17 Oct 2021, at 22:05, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>> Maybe I would group together the changes that all require the same version
>> test, rather than keeping the output columns in the same order.

> I agree with that, if we're doing all this we might as well go all the way for
> readability.

OK, I'll make it so.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2021-10-19 13:25:52 Re: Partial aggregates pushdown
Previous Message Amit Langote 2021-10-19 13:14:59 pgstat_assert_is_up() can fail in walsender