| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Commitfest overflow |
| Date: | 2021-08-03 19:42:57 |
| Message-ID: | 1773453.1628019777@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> But it's not clear to me whether you're arguing for CFM to assess this,
> or whether someone else should make this decision?
> IMHO asking the CFM to do this would be a tremendous burden - properly
> assessing 50+ patches is a lot of work, and probably requires a fairly
> experienced hacker ...
Yeah. I can recall that once or twice, Andres went through and triaged
all the open patches, which was tremendously helpful and I'm sure took a
serious investment of time. That way doesn't scale. But maybe if we
split the work among half a dozen or so senior hackers, it'd be a
tolerable amount of work per-person?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-08-03 19:54:11 | Re: Commitfest overflow |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-08-03 19:39:29 | Re: A varint implementation for PG? |