Re: mapping object names to role IDs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: mapping object names to role IDs
Date: 2010-05-23 17:39:33
Message-ID: 17728.1274636373@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I think both Stephen and I are saying we don't see merit in that.
>> Moving around pre-existing functions won't accomplish much except
>> causing include-list churn. Let's just standardize the names/APIs
>> and be done.

> Where do we put the new functions?

Probably in files that are already concerned with each object type.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-05-23 18:05:00 Re: mapping object names to role IDs
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-05-23 17:18:29 Re: mapping object names to role IDs