Re: logistics for beta3

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: logistics for beta3
Date: 2010-07-05 16:18:38
Message-ID: 1770.1278346718@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Yeah, I hope to get that committed today. Any later than today will not
>> leave enough time for buildfarm testing before the wrap.

> Hmm. So does that mean we need to get log_temp_files fixed today also?

No, I'm just concerned about the possibility of needing multiple
buildfarm cycles to shake out platform-specific problems with the
LDFLAGS changes. The log_temp_files business doesn't have any
portability risks AFAICS.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Browne 2010-07-05 16:33:49 Buildfarm + Git tryouts
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-07-05 15:43:36 Re: logistics for beta3