Re: Creating a function for exposing memory usage of backend process

From: torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Creating a function for exposing memory usage of backend process
Date: 2020-07-01 13:18:01
Message-ID: 176dc98d38e6eb28f011104eff6cc197@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-07-01 20:47, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

> For the next version (if there will be one), please remove the
> catversion bump
> from the patch as it will otherwise just break patch application
> without
> constant rebasing (as it's done now). The committer will handle the
> catversion
> change if/when it gets committed.
>
> cheers ./daniel

Thanks for telling me it!
I'll do that way next time.

Regards,

--
Atsushi Torikoshi
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2020-07-01 13:20:50 Re: track_planning causing performance regression
Previous Message torikoshia 2020-07-01 13:15:08 Re: Creating a function for exposing memory usage of backend process