Re: Extending System Views: proposal for 8.1/8.2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Extending System Views: proposal for 8.1/8.2
Date: 2005-01-23 00:42:12
Message-ID: 17679.1106440932@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jim C. Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> If we're dropping the pg_, maybe call the new schema just 'catalog'?

Any new schemas introduced by PG itself will be named pg_something.
This is not open to negotiation --- it's what we've promised to users
to avoid tromping on their schema namespace.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-01-23 03:02:25 Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED
Previous Message Nicolai Tufar 2005-01-23 00:08:47 Re: [HACKERS] %2$, %1$ gettext placeholder replacement is not working under Win32