BUG #17602: Query backend process killed because it uses up all memory.

From: PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: higherone(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: BUG #17602: Query backend process killed because it uses up all memory.
Date: 2022-08-30 16:11:40
Message-ID: 17602-b072900fa964cabf@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference: 17602
Logged by: alun
Email address: higherone(at)gmail(dot)com
PostgreSQL version: 12.8
Operating system: centos
Description:

Hi,

I'm writing to seek for generic help on trouble shooting bugs related to
query backend process killed because of memory exhaust on this single query
process.

The query is a simple update or insert query like this, and sequence_id has
a btree index. The query process will use up all the memory very quickly
(about 10 minutes) and cause the server to restart.
update folders set sequence_id=40 where id=501;

I suspect the index is corrupt, but after drop the btree index, this issue
still can be reproduced. And when I use pg_amcheck tool to check the btree
index, it's showing no error.
And more strange, if I drop another gist index that's on another field of
the same table, this issue can not be reproduced anymore. But I don't think
the gist index is related to that bad update/insert sql. It's a pity that I
don't have a tool that can detect if gist index is corrupt.

I can not reproduce this issue on a clean db instance. However in my
snapshot db with prod data, I can reproduce this issue stably. It's a pity I
can not share the snapshot db for trouble shooting, so here I'm writing to
the group, hoping to get some suggestions on how to trouble shoot further.

Thanks a lot!

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-08-30 19:01:31 Re: BUG #17602: Query backend process killed because it uses up all memory.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-08-30 14:25:02 Re: Segfault when using function and custom-type