Re: d25ea01275 and partitionwise join

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Richard Guo <riguo(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: d25ea01275 and partitionwise join
Date: 2020-02-28 23:18:40
Message-ID: 17580.1582931920@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:00 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Just to leave a breadcrumb in this thread --- the planner failure
>> induced by d25ea01275 has been fixed in 529ebb20a. The difficulty
>> with multiway full joins that Amit started this thread with remains
>> open, but I imagine the posted patches will need rebasing over
>> 529ebb20a.

> Here are the rebased patches.

The cfbot shows these patches as failing regression tests. I think
it is just cosmetic fallout from 6ef77cf46 having changed EXPLAIN's
choices of table alias names; but please look closer to confirm,
and post updated patches.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-02-28 23:19:18 Re: SLRU statistics
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-02-28 23:05:35 Re: Portal->commandTag as an enum