Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling
Date: 2010-01-06 14:49:14
Message-ID: 1757.1262789354@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com> writes:
> Let me ask the question another way... is there any reason to drop plans
> other than limiting memory usage?

No, that's about it. The only reason to care is if you'd otherwise have
a code path that would repetitively leak plans.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-01-06 15:00:04 Re: [HACKERS] tribble.postgresql.org - planned maintenance downtime
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-06 14:46:26 Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling