Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vaibhav Dalvi <vaibhav(dot)dalvi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
Date: 2025-11-11 15:11:52
Message-ID: 17555e46-4fb2-4265-90e0-95cb8ed584a6@dunslane.net
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2025-11-11 Tu 12:59 AM, Mahendra Singh Thalor wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Here, I am attaching an updated patch for the review and testing.
>
> FIX: as suggested by Vaibhav, added error for --restrict-key option
> with non-text format.
>

Regarding the name and format of the globals toc file, I'm inclined to
think we should always use custom format, regardless of whether the
individual databases will be in custom, tar or directory formats, and
that it should be called something distinguishable, e.g. toc.glo.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sugamoto Shinya 2025-11-11 15:13:49 Re: [PATCH] Add hints for invalid binary encoding names in encode/decode functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-11-11 15:04:08 Re: CURL_IGNORE_DEPRECATION