| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Regina Obe" <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Ability to reference other extensions by schema in extension scripts |
| Date: | 2022-11-10 17:37:38 |
| Message-ID: | 175298.1668101858@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Regina Obe" <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us> writes:
>> I have a distinct sense of deja vu here. I think this idea, or something
>> isomorphic to it, was previously discussed with some other syntax details.
> I found the old discussion I recalled having and Stephen had suggested using
> @extschema{'postgis'}@
> On this thread --
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160425232251.GR10850@tamriel.snowman.net
> Is that the one you remember?
Hmmm ... no, ISTM it was considerably more recent than that.
[ ...digs... ] Here we go, it was in the discussion around
converting contrib SQL functions to new-style:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/3395418.1618352794%40sss.pgh.pa.us
There are a few different ideas bandied around in there.
Personally I still like the @extschema:extensionname@
option the best, though.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Corey Huinker | 2022-11-10 17:58:34 | Re: Document parameter count limit |
| Previous Message | David Christensen | 2022-11-10 16:22:28 | Re: [PATCH] Teach pg_waldump to extract FPIs from the WAL |