Re: Call for platforms

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: thomas(at)pgsql(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Call for platforms
Date: 2001-03-23 08:33:03
Message-ID: 17485.985336383@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>> The bit test diffs seem to indicate that bit_cmp is messed up. That
>> depends on memcmp. I seem to recall something about memcmp not being
>> 8-bit-clean on SunOS ... does that ring a bell with anyone?

> Good point. From the man page of memcmp(3) on this machine:

> BUGS
> memcmp() uses native character comparison, which is signed
> on some machines and unsigned on other machines. Thus the
> sign of the value returned when one of the characters has
> its high-order bit set is implementation-dependent.

Eeek.

The C spec documents I have at hand all agree that memcmp, strcmp,
etc shall interpret their arguments as unsigned char. I hope Sun
were the only ones who took the above more liberal interpretation...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-03-23 08:45:28 Re: Call for platforms
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-03-23 08:19:17 Re: Call for platforms

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-03-23 08:45:28 Re: Call for platforms
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-03-23 08:19:17 Re: Call for platforms