Re: pgbench - minor doc improvements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench - minor doc improvements
Date: 2016-08-19 21:41:40
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> writes:
> Minor pgbench documentation improvements so that the description is more
> precise:
> - a pgbench script may not contain SQL commands, it only needs not to be
> empty.
> - point out explicitely variable setting meta commands.
> - the formula is short enough to fit on a line.

I looked at this, but I don't really find any of these changes to be
improvements. They just make it harder to read IMO.

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-08-19 21:55:25 Re: Re: PROPOSAL: make PostgreSQL sanitizers-friendly (and prevent information disclosure)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-08-19 21:35:10 Re: pgbench - allow empty queries