Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Technically, there's no reason why we can't do this for 9.1. What we
> can do is change the name of the "time with timezone" type to
> something like "oldtimetz", keeping the current OID. And then we can
> add a new type called "time with timezone". [ with large amounts of
> consequent work ]
I think you missed the point of my response, which is that there are
easily 10^6 more-pressing things to work on than the size of timetz.
Do you know of any actual use cases for it?
regards, tom lane