Re: Credits For v19

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Credits For v19
Date: 2026-08-28 20:10:59
Message-ID: 173D924F-0EDC-4EE3-9AF9-41854B75159F@yesql.se
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 28 Aug 2026, at 20:53, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> While commits are still coming in that would fit the v19 window, it may be
> easier for the committer to manually scan those commits against the existing
> list (whichever they choose to use) than wait for me to re-generate the list,
> though I'm happy to do so if requested.

It seems like a safer approach to regenerate the data based on the commits
which have happened since you ran the report last.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-08-28 20:11:40 Re: Should the WAIT FOR command tag be "WAIT" or "WAIT FOR"?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2026-08-28 20:06:46 Allow tuple visibility checks without hint-bit, maintenance