From: | PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | james(dot)inform(at)pharmapp(dot)de |
Subject: | BUG #17387: Working in PG13 but not in PGH14: array_agg(RECORD) |
Date: | 2022-01-28 17:22:06 |
Message-ID: | 17387-5dfe54b988444963@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 17387
Logged by: James Inform
Email address: james(dot)inform(at)pharmapp(dot)de
PostgreSQL version: 14.1
Operating system: Mac and Linux (Ubuntu)
Description:
While the following sql works under PG13:
with q_data as (
select '1' as testa, 1 as testb
union
select '2' as testa, 2 as testb
union
select '3' as testa, 3 as testb
union
select '4' as testa, 4 as testb
)
select array_agg(q) || array_agg(q) from q_data q;
and results in:
{"(3,3)","(1,1)","(4,4)","(2,2)","(3,3)","(1,1)","(4,4)","(2,2)"}
the same SQL on PG14.1 fails with:
ERROR: operator is not unique: record[] || record[]
LINE 10: select array_agg(q) || array_agg(q) from q_data q;
^
HINT: Could not choose a best candidate operator. You might need to add
explicit type casts.
Let's not discuss if such an sql makes sense.
But question is: Why is PG14 giving an error while PG13 works?
Cheers,
James
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2022-01-28 20:19:57 | Re: BUG #17387: Working in PG13 but not in PGH14: array_agg(RECORD) |
Previous Message | Drouvot, Bertrand | 2022-01-28 16:17:20 | snapshot recovery conflict despite hot_standby_feedback set to on |