Re: Microvacuum support for Hash Index

From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Microvacuum support for Hash Index
Date: 2016-12-30 14:27:45
Message-ID: 1736f8be-965b-32cf-6e8d-7778a7b380f5@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/11/2016 12:11 AM, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
> Hi Jesper,
>
>> Some initial comments.
>>
>> _hash_vacuum_one_page:
>>
>> + END_CRIT_SECTION();
>> + _hash_chgbufaccess(rel, metabuf, HASH_READ, HASH_NOLOCK);
>>
>> The _hash_chgbufaccess() needs a comment.
>>
>> You also need a place where you call pfree for so->killedItems - maybe in
>> hashkillitems().
>
> Thanks for reviewing this patch. I would like to update you that this
> patch has got dependency on a patch for concurrent hash index and WAL
> log in hash index. So, till these two patches for hash index are not
> stable I won't be able to share you a next version of patch for
> supporting microvacuum in hash index.
>

This can be rebased on the WAL v7 patch [1]. In addition to the previous
comments you need to take commit 7819ba into account.

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1%2BdmGNTFMnLO4EbOWJDHUq%3D%2Ba2L8T%3D72ifXeh-Kd8HOsg%40mail.gmail.com

Best regards,
Jesper

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2016-12-30 14:32:41 Re: proposal: session server side variables
Previous Message Yuriy Zhuravlev 2016-12-30 14:10:45 Re: WIP: About CMake v2