| From: | Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Memory leaks in BufFileOpenShared() |
| Date: | 2018-06-15 08:42:33 |
| Message-ID: | 17325.1529052153@localhost |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> The changes were made by this commit to add infrastructure for sharing
> temporary files between backends, according to the author (Thomas
> Munro).
>
> https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/dc6c4c9dc2a111519b76b22daaaac86c5608223b
>
> Your proposal looks reasonable but I would like to hear from Thomas's
> opinion as well.
o.k. He can actually have different feeling about details, e.g. if a new
function makeBufFileCommon() should be introduced or if makeBufFile() should
do the common settings. In the latter case, BufFileCreateTemp() would have to
do more work than it does now.
--
Antonin Houska
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26, A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-06-15 08:54:41 | Re: Memory leaks in BufFileOpenShared() |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-06-15 08:39:02 | Re: why partition pruning doesn't work? |