Re: Using quicksort for every external sort run

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Using quicksort for every external sort run
Date: 2015-08-20 13:54:47
Message-ID: 17309.1440078887@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Alternately, has anyone tested whether Timsort would work well?

I think that was proposed a few years ago and did not look so good
in simple testing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-08-20 13:59:25 exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions
Previous Message Greg Stark 2015-08-20 13:54:02 Re: PostgreSQL for VAX on NetBSD/OpenBSD