Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
Date: 2019-02-22 17:54:47
Message-ID: 17295.1550858087@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 3:43 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> We are certainly not supposed to go DROP SCHEMA on the temp namespaces, ...

> Actually, I think that's supposed to work.

If it's in active use by any session (including your own), that's not going
to have nice consequences; the owning session will have the OID in
static storage, and it will be unhappy when that OID becomes dangling.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2019-02-22 18:01:46 Re: speeding up planning with partitions
Previous Message Amit Langote 2019-02-22 17:54:35 Re: speeding up planning with partitions