Re: log_autovacuum

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: log_autovacuum
Date: 2007-08-03 16:38:46
Message-ID: 17277.1186159126@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>> Could I suggest renaming log_autovacuum to log_autovacuum_min_duration?

> Sure, whatever makes the most sense. In fact min_duration would be more
> consistent.

I'm not sure I believe Greg's argument about needing more autovac
logging parameters, but since this one acts just like
log_min_duration_statement, I concur with renaming it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Saito 2007-08-03 16:48:11 Re: .NET driver
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-08-03 16:03:51 Re: log_autovacuum