Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne(dot)adam(at)nokia(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Duquesne, Pierre (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <pierre(dot)duquesne(at)nokia(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Date: 2017-08-17 15:21:30
Message-ID: 17275.1502983290@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think the another patch posted above to add a new guc for
> enable_gather is still relevant and important.

FWIW, I'm pretty much -1 on that. I don't see that it has any
real-world use; somebody who wants to turn that off would likely
really want to turn off parallelism altogether. We have
mucho knobs in that area already.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-08-17 17:50:47 Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-08-17 15:09:19 Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antonin Houska 2017-08-17 15:22:22 Re: WIP: Aggregation push-down
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-08-17 15:09:19 Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90