From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne(dot)adam(at)nokia(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Duquesne, Pierre (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <pierre(dot)duquesne(at)nokia(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
Date: | 2017-08-17 15:21:30 |
Message-ID: | 17275.1502983290@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think the another patch posted above to add a new guc for
> enable_gather is still relevant and important.
FWIW, I'm pretty much -1 on that. I don't see that it has any
real-world use; somebody who wants to turn that off would likely
really want to turn off parallelism altogether. We have
mucho knobs in that area already.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-17 17:50:47 | Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-08-17 15:09:19 | Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Antonin Houska | 2017-08-17 15:22:22 | Re: WIP: Aggregation push-down |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-08-17 15:09:19 | Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |