| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Clear out the reminants of EXTEND INDEX |
| Date: | 2001-07-16 20:30:59 |
| Message-ID: | 17272.995315459@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Yea, but in each group there are items that sort of go together. In the
> current XXX discussion, the Remove* items go together, right? If we had
> a new Remove item, we should put it with the others, not at the bottom.
That has not been our practice in the past. For the most part we've
added new node types at the ends of their sections. If we were going
to organize the numbering as you suggest then a lot of rearrangement
could be done (and NO, I am NOT advocating that).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Yurtaev | 2001-07-17 10:19:47 | libpq win32-native errno fix |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-16 20:17:20 | Re: Clear out the reminants of EXTEND INDEX |