| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Date: | 2007-10-10 15:30:47 |
| Message-ID: | 17262.1192030247@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> I also agree with this. We have to pretend it isn't in /contrib now,
> figure out where want it, then put it there (contrib, pgfoundry, core).
Putting it in core now would mean forcing a post-beta1 initdb, which
I don't think adequate cause has been shown for.
Possibly we should sit on the decision for awhile and see if any
initdb-forcing bugs are reported. But for the moment I think only the
contrib or pgfoundry options are acceptable.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2007-10-10 15:33:03 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-10 15:26:54 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2007-10-10 15:33:03 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-10 15:26:54 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |