Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ...
Date: 2006-09-06 03:24:16
Message-ID: 1726.1157513056@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com> writes:
> Fine with me. Two questions:

> - Where would the code live, if it were in core?

New file under utils/adt/ probably ... it's not a new datatype exactly,
but that's the default place for new SQL-visible functions.

> - Shall I hack up the API you suggested in your earlier message?

I'm not wedded to any part of that proposal, but I haven't seen any
objections or better ideas yet ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-09-06 03:25:40 Re: Win32 hard crash problem
Previous Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2006-09-06 03:14:23 Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ...