Re: Proposal: json_populate_record and nested json objects

From: Chris Travers <chris(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: json_populate_record and nested json objects
Date: 2013-09-16 00:13:49
Message-ID: 1720654706.211305.1379290429511.open-xchange@email.1and1.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 15 September 2013 at 18:42 Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 09/14/2013 10:27 PM, chris travers wrote:
>
> Well, you could fairly easily build it as an extension as a POC. The
> main point of the API this is built on was to allow for extensions.
>
> The logic changes might be a bit tricky. I'll be interested to see what
> you come up with.
>
> If we're going to do this we should make these handle arrays as well as
> objects.

Yes, arrays are necessary for my use case. I probably should have been explicit
that I needed that too.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
http://www.2ndquadrant.com
PostgreSQL Services, Training, and Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Satoshi Nagayasu 2013-09-16 04:20:52 Re: [PoC] pgstattuple2: block sampling to reduce physical read
Previous Message Ian Lawrence Barwick 2013-09-16 00:11:56 Re: Commitfest II, 9.4 edition