Re: Potential problem with HOT and indexes?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Potential problem with HOT and indexes?
Date: 2009-03-08 17:36:08
Message-ID: 172.1236533768@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Another thought now though. What if someone updates the pg_index entry --
> since we never reset indcheckxmin then the new tuple will have a new xmin and
> will suddenly become invisible again for no reason.

Hmm ... if updates to pg_index entries were common then I could get
worried about that, but they really aren't.

> Couldn't this happen if you set a table WITHOUT CLUSTER for example? Or if
> --as possibly happened in the user's case-- you reindex the table and don't
> find any HOT update chains but the old pg_index entry had indcheckxmin set
> already?

This is all useless guesswork until we find out whether he was using
REINDEX or CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2009-03-08 17:45:53 Re: Potential problem with HOT and indexes?
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2009-03-08 17:12:23 Re: Potential problem with HOT and indexes?