Re: Add test of pg_prewarm extenion

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dong Wook Lee <sh95119(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Add test of pg_prewarm extenion
Date: 2022-08-01 14:27:57
Message-ID: 1719591.1659364077@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 5:16 PM Dong Wook Lee <sh95119(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I have no idea how to deal with race conditions.
>> Does anybody know how to deal with this?

> Couldn't you use $node->wait_for_log() instead?

Yeah. The standard usage pattern for that also covers the issue
of not re-examining prior chunks of the log.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2022-08-01 14:31:00 Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns
Previous Message Japin Li 2022-08-01 14:24:24 Re: Typo in pg_db_role_setting.h