Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Security and Impersonation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Security and Impersonation
Date: 1999-07-24 16:32:49
Message-ID: 1719.932833969@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I'll look through the SQL3 stuff, and see what I can find.
>
> I've now done this,and it's in the SQL3 standard. It is implemented via
> Modules. The idea being that all routines (procedures and functions) apear
> in a module, and that the module can have a 'Module Authorization
> Identifier'.

Cool. I doubt anyone will object to adding this SQL3 feature to
Postgres, if you feel like working on it.

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-07-24 16:40:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SSL patch
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 1999-07-24 16:30:20 duplicate records (6.5.1)