Re: CommitFest rules

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: CommitFest rules
Date: 2008-07-10 14:52:29
Message-ID: 1715.1215701549@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I surely do not have an objection to having a link defined as above ---
>> I just wanted to be clear on what we meant by "current commitfest".
>> We probably need two separate terms for "the place to submit new
>> patches" and "the place we are trying to commit patches from".

> Well we have two separate links now, with hints as to their usage:

> # Upcoming CommitFest - add new patches here
> # In-progress CommitFest - patch review underway here

That's fine, but what Bruce asked for was bookmarkable links defined in
both ways --- right now, only the first one has a permanent alias.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aidan Van Dyk 2008-07-10 15:01:04 Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP
Previous Message Robert Hodges 2008-07-10 14:44:20 Re: Follow-up on replication hooks for PostgreSQL