Re: About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Mark Wielaard <mjw(at)redhat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package
Date: 2009-03-10 23:49:39
Message-ID: 17117.1236728979@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> As of CVS HEAD, I see that we got rid of that, and pg_trace.h is now
>> included only by the .c files that actually need it. ISTM that we
>> should make 8.3 do likewise.

> Here's a patch for this.

Oh, thanks, I was just about to go off and do that myself, but you
saved me the trouble. Please commit.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-03-10 23:53:44 Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-03-10 23:07:34 Re: About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package