| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |
| Date: | 2005-04-02 06:31:13 |
| Message-ID: | 1706.1112423473@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Also, since plPerlNG is maintained on PgFoundry, are the changes you are
> making to core getting migrated back to the main project itself?
I don't know, and not being a maintainer of the pgfoundry project,
it is *definitely* not my problem. But I cannot believe it's a
good idea to have two supposedly authoritative CVS repositories
for the same code...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-04-02 07:46:50 | Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-02 06:21:21 | Re: Debugging deadlocks |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2005-04-02 07:19:17 | Re: invalidating cached plans |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-02 06:21:21 | Re: Debugging deadlocks |