Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format
Date: 2009-08-10 17:34:08
Message-ID: 17042.1249925648@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Thanks Tom. I have removed the V1 stuff as you suggest, and placed
> the declaration in numeric.h.

> Here's version 7.

Working through this now, and I noticed that the example added to the
manual seems to be wrong:

<entry><literal>to_char(0.000485, '9.99EEEE')</literal></entry>
<entry><literal>' 4.850e-04'</literal></entry>

With 9.99 as the pattern, I'd expect (and indeed I get) 4.85e-04
not 4.850e-04. This is correct behavior, no?

Also, I'm wondering what should happen with

regression=# select to_char(0.000485, '99.99EEEE');
to_char
-----------
4.85e-04
(1 row)

Doesn't seem quite right. Should we throw error if the number of 9's
before the decimal point isn't 1?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-08-10 17:42:01 Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-08-10 17:33:18 Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows