| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Error-safe user functions |
| Date: | 2022-12-01 20:49:42 |
| Message-ID: | 1703871.1669927782@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 2:41 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I'd be the first to agree that "ereturn"
>> doesn't capture that detail very well, but I don't have a better name.
>> (And I do like the fact that this name is the same length as "ereport",
>> so that we won't end up with lots of reindentation to do.)
> I don't think it's sensible to make decisions about important syntax
> on the basis of byte-length. Reindenting is a one-time effort; code
> clarity will be with us forever.
Sure, but without a proposal for a better name, that's irrelevant.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2022-12-01 21:12:25 | Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-12-01 20:17:51 | Re: meson PGXS compatibility |