more C99 cleanup

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: more C99 cleanup
Date: 2025-11-21 13:50:03
Message-ID: 170308e6-a7a3-4484-87b2-f960bb564afa@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I have been hunting down the last few pieces of code that made some
obsolete claims about not being able to use C99 yet or needing to be
compatible with pre-C99 or something like that. I found two obsolete
comments and two places where we could now actually use the C99
functionality that the comment was anticipating.

At least according to my grepping, all the remaining mentions of "C99"
are now up to date and relevant.

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Replace-internal-C-function-pg_hypot-by-standard-hyp.patch text/plain 5.2 KB
0002-Update-comment-related-to-C99.patch text/plain 975 bytes
0003-Fix-pg_isblank.patch text/plain 4.6 KB
0004-Remove-obsolete-comment.patch text/plain 1.7 KB

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2025-11-21 13:56:33 Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
Previous Message Boris Mironov 2025-11-21 13:26:05 Re: Idea to enhance pgbench by more modes to generate data (multi-TXNs, UNNEST, COPY BINARY)