Re: Fixing busted citext function declarations

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fixing busted citext function declarations
Date: 2015-05-07 23:19:13
Message-ID: 1701.1431040753@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 04:19:52PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Just a reality check but this will break a pg_upgrade, and will not be
>> detected by --check.

> Actually, pg_upgrade might be OK because the views would be recreated
> with the new functions already installed.

pg_upgrade is okay in any case because it dumps and reloads the current
extension's components. Doesn't matter whether there's another version
that is not compatible.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2015-05-07 23:25:54 Re: Fixing busted citext function declarations
Previous Message Sawada Masahiko 2015-05-07 22:55:24 Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE