Re: [HACKERS] Re: Improve OR conditions on joined columns (common star schema problem)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Jim Nasby <jim(dot)nasby(at)openscg(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Improve OR conditions on joined columns (common star schema problem)
Date: 2018-10-02 14:53:40
Message-ID: 1696.1538492020@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 09:32:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> FWIW, my problem with this patch is that I remain unconvinced of the basic
>> correctness of the transform (specifically the unique-ification approach).
>> Noah's points would be important to address if we were moving the patch
>> towards commit, but I don't see much reason to put effort into it until
>> we can think of a way to prove whether that works.

> Not even effort to fix the assertion failures I reported?

If it seemed relevant to the proof-of-correctness problem, I would look
into it, but ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-10-02 14:58:53 Re: transction_timestamp() inside of procedures
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-10-02 14:49:01 Re: transction_timestamp() inside of procedures