From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |
Date: | 2015-08-05 15:12:34 |
Message-ID: | 16953.1438787554@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Ok, lets' do it that way then. It seems the easiest way to test for this
> is to use something like
> # "IBM XL C/C++ for AIX, V12.1" miscompiles, for 32-bit, some inline
> # expansions of ginCompareItemPointers() "long long" arithmetic. To
> # take advantage of inlining, build a 64-bit PostgreSQL.
> test $(getconf HARDWARE_BITMODE) == '32' then
> CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -DPG_FORCE_DISABLE_INLINE"
> fi
> in the xlc part of the template?
Actually, much the easiest way to convert what Noah did would be to add
#if defined(__ILP32__) && defined(__IBMC__)
#define PG_FORCE_DISABLE_INLINE
#endif
in src/include/port/aix.h.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-08-05 15:19:05 | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-08-05 14:59:59 | Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention |