| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Set log_line_prefix and application name in test drivers |
| Date: | 2016-09-29 14:06:18 |
| Message-ID: | 16946.1475157978@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> As long as we get %t and %p in there we're going to be way ahead, really.
Could we get consensus on just changing the default to
log_line_prefix = '%t [%p] '
and leaving the rest out of it? I think pretty much everybody agrees
that those fields are useful, whereas the rest of it is a lot more
context-dependent. (For example, there are a whole lot of real
installations where neither %u nor %d would be worth the log space.)
Personally I'm also on board with using this for regression testing:
log_line_prefix = '%t [%p] %q%a '
but I doubt it can be sold as a general-purpose default.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2016-09-29 14:13:26 | Re: Set log_line_prefix and application name in test drivers |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-09-29 13:59:53 | Re: Tuplesort merge pre-reading |