| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Decoupling our alignment assumptions about int64 and double |
| Date: | 2026-01-30 01:21:20 |
| Message-ID: | 1694571.1769736080@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Here's a v2 responding to your suggestions. 0001 refactors
att_align_nominal(), and then 0002 is nearly the same as the
prior patch except for rebasing over that change. I added
a test case for alignment = max too (the other cases seem
covered already, somewhat indirectly via pg_upgrade testing).
I think this might be about ready to go, unless somebody has
a better idea than 'l' for the catalog representation of
TYPALIGN_INT64.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Refactor-att_align_nominal-to-improve-performance.patch | text/x-diff | 35.7 KB |
| v2-0002-Decouple-our-alignment-assumptions-about-int64-an.patch | text/x-diff | 49.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chao Li | 2026-01-30 01:22:16 | Re: Proposal: Cascade REPLICA IDENTITY changes to leaf partitions |
| Previous Message | Alexander Borisov | 2026-01-30 00:18:32 | Re: Non-committer reviews: is it helpful? |