Re: Patch abstracts in the Commitfest app

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch abstracts in the Commitfest app
Date: 2021-11-12 15:03:16
Message-ID: 1686032.1636729396@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 8:51 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>> It should be a free-form textfield, and only apply to new submissions to avoid
>> a need to backfill. The field should, IMHO, be mandatory. The implementation
>> can be left to discussion on -www iff this list agrees that it would be a good
>> thing.

> +1 for the idea. Not sure if that should be mandatory though, as some
> simple entries should be self explanatory.

Yeah, there are plenty of entries for which the title seems adequate.
No objection to making room for an additional optional description,
though.

> Really this is mainly
> helpful for long and lengthy threads, when people start to ask a
> summary of the situation, so it should be editable and maybe
> automatically generates an email on the thread when that happens.

Editable certainly, but I don't think we want any auto-generated mail.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-11-12 15:05:22 Re: Test::More version
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-11-12 15:00:14 Re: Test::More version