Re: wal-size limited to 16MB - Performance issue for subsequent backup

From:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:	jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc
Cc:	"Pg Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: wal-size limited to 16MB - Performance issue for subsequent backup
Date:	2014-10-20 19:08:29
Message-ID:	16847.1413832109@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2014-10-20 19:03:59 from jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc  2014-10-20 19:08:29 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>   2014-10-20 19:27:39 from jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc    2014-10-20 19:39:03 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>  2014-10-20 19:27:21 from "ktm(at)rice(dot)edu" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>  2014-10-20 19:35:08 from Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>   2014-10-20 19:41:26 from jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc    2014-10-20 19:49:40 from Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>     2014-10-20 20:02:05 from jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc      2014-10-22 06:56:02 from Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>  2014-10-21 21:12:11 from Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>  2014-10-22 00:43:20 from Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• wal-size limited to 16MB - Performance issue for subsequent backup at 2014-10-20 19:03:59 from jesper

Responses

• Re: wal-size limited to 16MB - Performance issue for subsequent backup at 2014-10-20 19:27:39 from jesper

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Tom Lane	2014-10-20 19:10:50	Re: Superuser connect during smart shutdown
Previous Message	jesper	2014-10-20 19:03:59	wal-size limited to 16MB - Performance issue for subsequent backup