Re: patch - per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: patch - per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost
Date: 2010-01-04 18:48:45
Message-ID: 16841.1262630925@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> My only objection to that is that if we're going to add attoptions
> also, I'd like to get this committed first before I start working on
> that, and we're running short on time. If you can commit his patch in
> the next day or two, then I am fine with rebasing mine afterwards, but
> if it needs more work than that then I would prefer to commit mine so
> I can move on. Is that reasonable?

Fair enough --- if I can't get it done today I will let you know and
hold off.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-01-04 18:51:50 Re: pg_migrator issues
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-04 18:47:14 Re: Thoughts on statistics for continuously advancing columns