I wrote:
> Yeah, it's visibly run 19 and HEAD before the older branches, which
> seems odd. Usually the BF client does the branches back-to-front.
However, even once that updates, we're going to have some problems.
Trying it locally, I see my animal complaining about updates from
REL_13_STABLE failing, which is unsurprising ... but how do we get
v13-or-before data into a shape that the patched code will accept?
regards, tom lane