Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?
Date: 2021-05-27 00:35:46
Message-ID: 1677691.1622075746@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> The efficiency bit is probably going to be swamped by the addition of
> the compression handling, given the amount of additional work we're now
> doing in in reform_and_rewrite_tuple().

Only if the user has explicitly requested a change of compression, no?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-05-27 00:49:14 Re: Race condition in recovery?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2021-05-27 00:31:44 Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?