Re: Bug in 9.6 tuplesort batch memory growth logic

From:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:	Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc:	Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Bug in 9.6 tuplesort batch memory growth logic
Date:	2016-09-06 19:51:35
Message-ID:	16771.1473191495@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2016-09-05 21:54:54 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> 📎  2016-09-06 13:17:55 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>   2016-09-06 15:40:34 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>    2016-09-06 16:41:48 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>     2016-09-06 19:51:35 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>      2016-09-06 19:52:06 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• Re: Bug in 9.6 tuplesort batch memory growth logic at 2016-09-06 16:41:48 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: Bug in 9.6 tuplesort batch memory growth logic at 2016-09-06 19:52:06 from Peter Geoghegan

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Peter Geoghegan	2016-09-06 19:52:06	Re: Bug in 9.6 tuplesort batch memory growth logic
Previous Message	Peter Geoghegan	2016-09-06 19:42:42	Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)