Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings
Date: 2009-09-22 04:07:40
Message-ID: 1677.1253592460@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ON instead of second ALTER looks better, and IMHO DATABASE <dbname> should
> be optional too:

> ALTER ROLE <rolename> [ON DATABASE <dbname>] SET <config> TO <value>;

IN, not ON.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeevan Chalke 2009-09-22 04:57:19 Re: numeric_to_number() function skipping some digits
Previous Message Gurjeet Singh 2009-09-22 03:31:14 Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings